Bill and Steve Demo-ed Windows 7 tonight. No video though, annoying.
Switched to Linux at work yesterday. Converted my Windows install to a virtual machine with Vmware's Converter. Thanks to Microsoft EULA you can't P2v a OEM licensed install of Windows XP. So I converted a Volume Licensed version. Will install needed software from there. I will be much more productive and happy. Will post screenies and comments etc.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Monday, May 19, 2008
Microhoo/Facesoft
With Microsoft supposed re-interest in Yahoo, and speculated buy out of Facebook. The question remains would you jump ship and dump Facebook/Yahoo services? I probably would.
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Splashtop
I have made mention of this before, (Splashtop) But Asus has announced that all their new motherboards will have this. (To bad wife's new Asus machine was purchased before this)
This is definitely a major step towards my ideas of OTE. It would truly be amazing, if could flip back to the linux OS after the main OS was booted with out having to restart
Will definitely be interested in hacking this.
This is definitely a major step towards my ideas of OTE. It would truly be amazing, if could flip back to the linux OS after the main OS was booted with out having to restart
Will definitely be interested in hacking this.
Adobe thank you
Adobe thank you for supporting linux from the get with flash 10.
I say this not because I am happy for linux, but because flash in my opinion is the only video format worth using in todays 'net world.
Whats the one video format you never have to struggle to use in all platforms? Flash.
I now will not even bother watching video unless it is flash. In linux you have trouble with Windows codecs, in Windows quicktime is always a hassle. Who wants to take the time to download a video and play in it a proprietary video player when I could just play the video in my browser?
Now that flash will be supported on all three platforms, I can always assume my OTE will be able to play my favorite videos.
I say this not because I am happy for linux, but because flash in my opinion is the only video format worth using in todays 'net world.
Whats the one video format you never have to struggle to use in all platforms? Flash.
I now will not even bother watching video unless it is flash. In linux you have trouble with Windows codecs, in Windows quicktime is always a hassle. Who wants to take the time to download a video and play in it a proprietary video player when I could just play the video in my browser?
Now that flash will be supported on all three platforms, I can always assume my OTE will be able to play my favorite videos.
Tuesday, May 13, 2008
Shoddy HP Laptop design
Pretty sad for a close to 2000 dollar laptop.
This laptop and several other models (8710p, 8510p and nx9420) close its design have horrible heat and video issues. HP I am disappointed, not that I expected much.
Monday, May 12, 2008
New Format and Direction
Its been months since I have posted, I know. I have done a lot in reference to open source/Linux communities. I have been shouting from the highest mountains "DOWN WITH VISTA"
I feel that my attitude in that respect has reached its limits. I feel the need for a new forum and a new debate. The rant begins.
I use two Windows XP machines at work. Both of the machines I use combinations of Firefox/Safari/Flock/Opera Web browsers. My primary goals of internet use: Gmail, Google Reader, Picasa Web albums, Facebook and twitter. To meet these goals, I do not require any given OS. Thus the argument of Linux vs. Windows, FOSS vs. proprietary software, is irrelevant in terms of my everyday use.
Easy of use vs. stability, both FOSS and Windows based systems have their ups and downs. Windows has more software available and tends to have better hardware support (XP). Linux on the other hand obviously has a good reputation in terms of stability. I can customize linux to my hearts content, plus one for linux. But the reality of the dream, microsoft killing, 1337 haxor OS is well, a dream. I can't even watch most video formats in linux. (Before you say what about 3rd party repositories etc. Forget it, it takes to much time and in my exp. still fails) TIME troubleshooting vs. Flawless use, that is the age old problem. I don't want to fix issue in linux(Ubuntu) as much as I don't want to fix issues on a Vista machine.
Attempt to get back on track..
Your persistent data/system setup is not necessary. Everything I care about on my machines is in the 'tubes' (Google services, Steam account for games) or on an external hard drive thus the computer I am using does not matter!
Am I getting clearer?
Anything I need I can put on a external device or in the 'tubes'. Changes to my hardware only need to configured for the current desired task. I don't need a 2000 dollar machine to browse the web, just as much as I do need a 2000 dollar machine to game.
What I want: A machine I can quickly switch environments pertaining to my needs/task.
I.E a 'bare metal' 'OS' or 'Operating Task Environment' (OTE-a term I just coined, check the patent office)
What I want to discuss:
What is an OTE?
How are they made?
What do they run on?
Are they virtual? Would it be capable of gaming?
Is this already availible?
Is this possible due to GPL vs. Windows EULA?
What kind of overhead is necessary?
Would this be based off of a single machine or some sort of cluster?
Is OTE to 'far-out' to discuss?
I feel that my attitude in that respect has reached its limits. I feel the need for a new forum and a new debate. The rant begins.
I use two Windows XP machines at work. Both of the machines I use combinations of Firefox/Safari/Flock/Opera Web browsers. My primary goals of internet use: Gmail, Google Reader, Picasa Web albums, Facebook and twitter. To meet these goals, I do not require any given OS. Thus the argument of Linux vs. Windows, FOSS vs. proprietary software, is irrelevant in terms of my everyday use.
Easy of use vs. stability, both FOSS and Windows based systems have their ups and downs. Windows has more software available and tends to have better hardware support (XP). Linux on the other hand obviously has a good reputation in terms of stability. I can customize linux to my hearts content, plus one for linux. But the reality of the dream, microsoft killing, 1337 haxor OS is well, a dream. I can't even watch most video formats in linux. (Before you say what about 3rd party repositories etc. Forget it, it takes to much time and in my exp. still fails) TIME troubleshooting vs. Flawless use, that is the age old problem. I don't want to fix issue in linux(Ubuntu) as much as I don't want to fix issues on a Vista machine.
Attempt to get back on track..
Your persistent data/system setup is not necessary. Everything I care about on my machines is in the 'tubes' (Google services, Steam account for games) or on an external hard drive thus the computer I am using does not matter!
Am I getting clearer?
Anything I need I can put on a external device or in the 'tubes'. Changes to my hardware only need to configured for the current desired task. I don't need a 2000 dollar machine to browse the web, just as much as I do need a 2000 dollar machine to game.
What I want: A machine I can quickly switch environments pertaining to my needs/task.
I.E a 'bare metal' 'OS' or 'Operating Task Environment' (OTE-a term I just coined, check the patent office)
What I want to discuss:
What is an OTE?
How are they made?
What do they run on?
Are they virtual? Would it be capable of gaming?
Is this already availible?
Is this possible due to GPL vs. Windows EULA?
What kind of overhead is necessary?
Would this be based off of a single machine or some sort of cluster?
Is OTE to 'far-out' to discuss?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)